Connect with us

News

Nnamdi Kanu refuses to open defence, insists there’s no charge against him

Published

on

Leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, has refused to open his defence in the terrorism charge filed against him.

At the resumed proceedings on Monday, Kanu who is defending himself after sacking his team of lawyers, said he has gone through his case file and there is no charge against him.

“Join me in praising God. I have gone through my case file, and there is no charge against me,” he began.

“There is no extant law in this country upon which the prosecution can predicate the charges against me. If there’s any, let my Lord read it out to me.

“So, I should not enter any defence in a charge that does not exist under any law in Nigeria. I urge you to release me today or grant me bail.”

Interjecting, James Omotosho, presiding judge, said Kanu needed to understand certain procedures of the law.

He said in a criminal trial, after the prosecution has closed its case, three things are open to the defendant. He is expected to file a no-case submission, and if the no-case submission is not sustained, the defendant is expected to put in a defence.

See also  Ex-minister loses first son in auto crash, three others in hospital

Omotosho said if the defendant chooses not to put in a defence, he has opted to rely on the case of the prosecution.

But Kanu insisted that there is no charge against him and that the trial judge should release him today or grant him bail because he is ill.

“I am being detained under a fraudulent charge that the supreme court has said it ought not to be,” he said.

Responding, Adegboyega Awomolo, counsel for the federal government, said the case has been brought to a close since the defendant has opted to rely on the case of the prosecution. Consequently, he prayed the court to fix a date for judgment.

‘GOD WILL HOLD ME RESPONSIBLE’

Again, Omotosho tried to explain to the defendant that not entering a defence in a criminal trial after a no-case submission had been heard and overruled is very dangerous.

The judge insisted that it is his duty to protect everyone — including the defendant.

See also  5,000 Lagos4Lagos supporters decamp to APC

He urged Kanu to consult lawyers who have experience in criminal prosecution so that he would be advised on what to do, especially on the implications of his decision not to enter his defence.

“I’m taking my time to explain all these to the defendant because I know it’s my responsibility to do so since he has no legal representation, and I know God will hold me responsible if I don’t,” the judge held.

“I am inclined, in the interest of justice, to give an adjournment either for the defendant to put in his defence or adopt his position not to enter a defence.”

Still, Kanu insisted that there is no charge against him.

CASE ADJOURNED

Awomolo said the court is yet to convince the prosecution on why the defendant deserves the opportunity of another adjournment.

He said the court should be bound by its earlier decision that the defendant has six days within which to start and close his defence.

See also  Buhari to Igbo leaders: Allow court decide Nnamdi Kanu’s fate

The prosecution counsel added that even if the court wants to grant an adjournment, it must be within the six days so as not to appear as vacating its own orders.

Omotosho explained to Awomolo that he has taken into consideration the peculiarity of the matter as the defendant is not a lawyer.

In conclusion, Omotosho said he will give the defendant seven days to consult knowledgeable lawyers with experience in criminal cases.

He thereafter adjourned the hearing to November 4, 5, 6, for the defendant to open his defence.

Omotosho said should Kanu fail to open his case, the court would take the final written addresses on November 6 and deem that the defendant has opted to rely on the case of the prosecution.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

EFCC says it froze Osun account over ‘fraudulent handling’ of N11bn ecological, intervention funds

Published

on

By

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has explained that it froze the bank account of the Osun state government over alleged fraudulent handling of N11 billion ecological and intervention funds.

The anti-graft agency, in a statement on Wednesday, said it has been investigating the Osun state government since March regarding the alleged mishandling of the funds.

According to the agency, some officials of the state government, including the accountant-general of the state, had been interviewed by EFCC investigators.

The agency said amid the probe, it observed that huge transfers of funds were being made from the account into different corporate entities since August 2.

“These ongoing investigations of the state government would not have warranted any placement of Post No Debit order on its account but for the precipitate and unwarranted movement of funds from the accounts to different suspicious accounts since August 2, 2026,” the statement reads.

See also  Ex-minister loses first son in auto crash, three others in hospital

“The Commission noticed huge transfers of funds into different corporate entities and had to swiftly halt the trend by freezing the accounts from which such heavy funds are being moved.

“The EFCC’s preventive mandate is a public-inclined framework of safeguarding public funds, assets and resources.

“The Commission cannot watch idly while a state government’s account is being pillaged.”

The anti-graft agency said it is aware of the forthcoming Osun governorship election, adding that it is “uncharitable” to overlook the huge transfers of funds over the “excuse of an upcoming election”.

“The Osun State government account was frozen to save public funds from being looted,” the agency said.

In a letter dated August 5, 2026, and signed by Adenike Babalola, assistant commander of the EFCC on behalf of the director of investigation, the anti-graft agency directed First Bank not to allow withdrawals from the Osun state government’s statutory allocation account as part of an ongoing investigation.

See also  Jurgen Klopp reveals the exact moment he 'knew' he had to QUIT Liverpool

The agency instructed the bank to place a post-no-debit restriction on the account pending the conclusion of the probe.

Reacting to the development, Ademola Adeleke, Osun governor, said the state government will not accept a situation in which federal government agencies trample upon the rights of subnational governments.

Adeleke said the Osun government has been witnessing numerous sponsored attacks, including the harassment of Accord party members and the move to stall the operations of LGAs in the state.

Adeleke said he has directed the attorney-general of the state to challenge the “illegality”.

Continue Reading

News

Osun threatens lawsuit as EFCC freezes govt account 10 days to election

Published

on

By

Less than 24 hours after Governor Ademola Adeleke alleged that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) was planning to freeze the state government account domiciled with First Bank, the anti-graft agency has reportedly freezed the account, according to Vanguard.

The account, reportedly used for the payment of workers’ salaries, was placed on “Post No Debit” status by the anti-graft agency.

The development came hours after Governor Ademola Adeleke raised the alarm that the EFCC was planning to freeze the state government’s accounts and those of top government officials ahead of the August 15 governorship election.

In a statement issued earlier on Wednesday by the Commissioner for Information and Public Enlightenment, Kolapo Alimi, Adeleke described the alleged move as an attempt to cripple government activities before the poll.

The governor had insisted that there was no legal basis for freezing the accounts of a state government, arguing that the EFCC lacked the statutory powers to take such action.

See also  Ex-minister loses first son in auto crash, three others in hospital

However, a source reportedly told Vanguard that the account had already been restricted.

“I can confirm that the state government account has been frozen by the EFCC. It is no longer an allegation. The governor will address the press shortly to update the public on the situation,” the source reportedly told Vanguard.

The reason for the restriction was not immediately known as of the time of filing this report.

The EFCC had yet to issue an official statement on the development.

The development comes as Osun prepares for its August 15 governorship election, with the account restriction expected to generate political reactions ahead of the poll.

Meanwhile, the state’s Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Oluwole Jimi-Bada, had said he has the mandate of the governor to sue the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission for freezing the government accounts.

Jimi-Bada said a ‘Post no debit’ letter from the EFCC was forwarded to the management of the First Bank where Osun government accounts were domiciled on Wednesday.

See also  Good morning and Happy New Month! Here Are Some Major News Headlines In The Newspapers Today: FG, NLC meeting over fuel subsidy removal ends in deadlock

The commissioner, who expressed readiness to proceed to court, said the move by the anti-graft agency may hamper government’s business, noted that Governor Ademola Adeleke was not using state funds to run its campaign for reelection.

“I have the mandate of the governor to proceed to the Federal High Court to challenge this move. EFCC can investigate the accounts but it can’t freeze the accounts without order of court.

Continue Reading

News

WAEC releases 2026 WASSCE results, withholds 167,486 candidate’s results over malpractice 

Published

on

By

The West African Examinations Council says it is withholding the results of 167,486 candidates, representing 8.59 per cent of those who sat the 2026 Computer-Based West African Senior School Certificate Examination for School candidates, over alleged examination malpractice.

This was disclosed by the Head of WAEC Nigeria National Office, Dr Amos Dangut, who announced the release of the results in Lagos on Wednesday.

The number of withheld reults, however, represents a decline from the 9.7 per cent recorded in 2025.

Dangut said the council withheld the affected results due to various infractions, including the increasing use of mobile phones in examination halls despite the existing ban and organised cheating in some schools.

“The increasing use of cell phones in the examination hall, in spite of the existing ban, and organised cheating in some schools, are other nagging issues,” Dangut said.

He added that some supervisors and invigilators found assisting candidates in malpractice had been arrested and would face disciplinary action through the relevant state ministries of education.

See also  BREAKING: Court dismisses Nnamdi Kanu’s N1bn suit against FG

A total of 1,959,668 candidates from 24,207 schools registered for the examination across Nigeria, Benin Republic, Côte d’Ivoire and Equatorial Guinea, while 1,950,726 candidates eventually sat for the examination.

1,200,514 candidates (61.54 per cent) obtained credits and above in at least five subjects, including English Language and Mathematics.

1,687,378 candidates (86.50 per cent) secured credits and above in a minimum of five subjects, with or without English Language and Mathematics.

The number of candidates who obtained credits in five subjects including English and Mathematics dropped by 1.42 percentage points compared with the 2025 examination.

Of the 1.2 million candidates who achieved credits in English and Mathematics:

558,883 (28.65 per cent) were male.

641,631 (32.89 per cent) were female.

Overall, 997,267 females (51.12 per cent) and 953,459 males (48.88 per cent) participated in the examination.

WAEC said 1,834,695 candidates, representing 94.05 per cent, had their results fully processed and released, while the results of 116,031 candidates (5.95 per cent) were still being processed.

See also  Nnamdi Kanu: Ohanaeze, IPOB describe S’Court judgment unfortunate

The council also disclosed that 1,213 candidates with special needs participated in the examination. They included:

137 visually impaired candidates;

491 candidates with hearing impairment;

55 spastic and mentally challenged candidates; and

41 physically challenged candidates.

The 2026 examination marked the second edition of the Computer-Based WASSCE for School Candidates, following the introduction of the format by WAEC.

Dangut said the council introduced several innovations, including the Digital Examiner Mark System to improve the speed of processing results, serialisation of question papers to curb malpractice, and a new portal that allows candidates to generate e-PINs directly for checking their results.

The examination was conducted between April 24 and June 19, 2026, with 102,708 examiners involved in marking across 88 marking venues.

Dangut, who described the briefing as his third and final engagement as WAEC Nigeria National Office head, said candidates sponsored by states indebted to the council would not have their results released until the outstanding payments were cleared.

See also  Jurgen Klopp reveals the exact moment he 'knew' he had to QUIT Liverpool

Continue Reading

Trending News