Connect with us

Trending News

WASSCE: ASUU, NUT clash over FG’s ban of under-18 candidates

Published

on

 

The Nigeria Union of Teachers has condemned the Federal Government’s decision to ban under-18 candidates from sitting for the West African Senior School Certificate Examination and the National Examination Council, even as the Academic Staff Union of Universities backed the policy, according to reports.

 

The Minister of Education, Prof. Tahir Mamman, announced on Channels Television’s ‘Sunday Politics’ programme that the Federal Government had instituted a new age policy for secondary school leaving examinations, setting the minimum age at 18.

 

This means underage candidates will no longer be allowed to sit for the West African Senior School Certificate Examination and the Senior School Certificate Examination, both crucial for advancing to tertiary education.

 

The directive also affects the West African Examinations Council, which administers the WASSCE, and the National Examinations Council responsible for the SSCE. Additionally, Mamman confirmed that the age limit to undertake the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination, overseen by the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board, will also be 18.

 

He added that this was not a new policy.

 

“For the avoidance of doubt, this is not a new policy; this is a policy that has been there for a long time,” Mamman stated.

 

“Even basically, if you compute the number of years pupils, and learners are supposed to be in school, the number you will end up with is 17 and a half – from early child care to primary school to junior secondary school and then senior secondary school. You will end up with 17 and a half by the time they are ready for admission.

 

“So, we are not coming up with a new policy, contrary to what some people are saying; we are just simply reminding people of what is existing. In any case, NECO and WAEC, henceforth, will not be allowing underage children to write their examinations. In other words, if somebody has not spent the requisite number of years in that particular level of study, WAEC and NECO will not allow them to write the examination.”

 

The minister went further to give a breakdown of the number of years pupils were expected to spend between child care and senior secondary school. According to him, early care is expected to last for the first five years. Pupils are expected to begin primary one at the age of six, spend six years in primary school and move to junior secondary school at the age of 12, spend three years, before moving to senior secondary school at the age of 15, then spend another three years before leaving for university at the age of 18.

 

Last month, Mamman, in a meeting with JAMB and other education stakeholders, insisted that the UTME should be set at 18 years.

See also  Protest video: Davido calls Yomi Fabiyi ‘mumu’

 

Mamman stated, “JAMB is hereby notified that there is now a ban on underage students, those under the age of 18, from our tertiary institutions for the 2024 admissions… It doesn’t require a statement of the minister… we are only restating what is in the law.”

 

However, the law sparked criticisms, particularly from university stakeholders, as many of those categorised as underage candidates had already taken the UTME without anticipating the directive. This posed a threat to potential 16 and 17-year-olds, who had already passed the UTME and were seeking admission into universities.

 

Following the disapproval, the minister reversed the directive, allowing candidates from 16 years to be admitted into the university as it previously stood until 2025.

 

However, following Sunday’s pronouncement, Mamman insisted that there was no going back on the policy.

 

The minister said, “It is 18 (years). What we did at the meeting that we had with JAMB (in July) was to allow this year and for it to serve as a kind of notice for parents that this year, JAMB will admit students who are below that age but from next year, JAMB is going to insist that anybody applying to go to university in Nigeria meets the required age, which is 18.”

 

But the Secretary-General, NUT, Dr Mike Ene, said that changes in society, like early enrollment in crèches due to economic pressures, made it unrealistic to restrict learning based on age.

 

“The only way this policy could work is if it’s implemented from the foundation. By that, I mean starting at the primary school level. In the past, before a child was allowed to start school, they had to pass a basic test — like reaching their hand over their head to touch the opposite ear. If they couldn’t, they were sent back home.

 

“However, things have changed. Nowadays, due to economic pressures, parents enroll their children in crèches early, which means both parents have to work,” Ene said.

“Teachers at these crèches begin to educate the children, and they start learning quickly. You can’t stop them from learning because the brain is structured to keep developing—once learning stops, the brain stagnates.”

 

He added that exceptional students, who might be younger but academically advanced, were not considered in the policy, warning that the policy could lead to legal challenges and urged the government to rethink it, calling it poorly conceived.

 

“You also have to consider exceptional students. Some students are 16 years old in SS3. Is the minister taking these scenarios into account? What are these students supposed to do? Wait two more years? I see this as a policy that could lead to numerous legal challenges. The government needs to rethink this thoroughly. It is poorly conceived.”

See also  ASUU not aware Nigeria is broke – Osodeke

 

Also speaking, National President, ASUP, Mr Shammah Kpanja, maintained that the decision to allow students under 18 to sit for exams should depend on their abilities, saying that gifted students might not need to spend the full years in school.

 

He advised the government to focus on critical issues like providing functional equipment in schools, addressing infrastructure deficits and improving teachers’ welfare, rather than on exam age restrictions.

 

Kpanja stated, “One issue with policy is that if it’s not realistic, it can lead to distorted information. The decision of whether a student should be 18 or younger to sit for exams should depend on the student’s abilities. Some students are exceptionally gifted and don’t need to spend all those years in school if they demonstrate a high level of intelligence.

 

“What we need is for the government to ensure that basic schools are equipped with functional facilities. In some villages around Abuja, you’ll find children sitting on the ground in schools, with many buildings lacking roofs. These are the real issues that need addressing. The welfare of teachers and the availability of functional libraries in most public secondary schools are also lacking. These should be the government’s targets — addressing infrastructure deficits instead of focusing on mundane matters.”

 

The polytechnic lecturer questioned the government’s priorities, pointing out inconsistencies, such as allowing child marriages in the North, while restricting younger students from taking WAEC.

 

“Did their children sit for WASSCE at 18 years? You allow young girls to marry at 12 in the North, but they can’t take WAEC at 16? What are the government’s priorities?”

 

Also, the Secretary-General, Committee of Vice-Chancellors of Nigerian Universities, Prof. Yakubu Ochefu, stated that the VCs would meet in September to take a stand on the policy.

 

“It has not been discussed by the committee. The committee will meet in September to have a conversation on it. For now, we do not have a position on the matter.”

 

He added, “In my view, we’ve been operating the 6-3-3-4 system, which is tied to specific age brackets. When a child reaches a certain age, they are expected to be at a certain educational level. This policy has been part of the law for years, though it hasn’t been enforced. Why is it now, when someone attempts to enforce it, that it becomes a problem for Nigerians? Yes, there are exceptional children, but they can be enrolled in schools for gifted children once they demonstrate such abilities.”

 

On his part, WAEC Head of National Office, Dr Amos Dagnut, emphasised that education in Nigeria was regulated by the government, adding that they had the right to enforce any policy they deemed fit.

See also  Tinubu will win 2027 if ADC fields a southern candidate - Kenneth Okonkwo

 

He said, “If the government is regulating education, it is within their purview to do so. We at WAEC do not regulate or keep records of candidates’ ages, as these details are submitted to us by the schools.”

 

National President, Academic Staff Union of Universities, Prof. Emmanuel Osodeke, maintained that ASUU had not yet discussed the matter, but stated on a personal note that children should follow the standard academic progression: six years in primary school, six years in secondary school, and then move on to university at the age of 18.

 

Osodeke questioned the rush to enter university, stating, “Why are we focusing on university at such a young age? How many years do you spend in the university? For most courses, it’s four years; for Medicine, it’s five. We can’t reduce these durations.

 

“They should allow the system to function as intended and give their children time to rest. Adulthood begins at 18, so why force a child to go to the university or rent an apartment at 15? We need to consider the well-being of these children.”

 

Similarly, National President, All Nigeria Confederation of Principals of Secondary Schools, Mallam Musa Ibrahim, expressed support for the government’s decision, stating that It was not just about intelligence; but more about emotional maturity.

He attributed the high failure rates in national examinations to students under 18 sitting for them.

 

“A student might be intellectually ready, but if they are not emotionally prepared, they can be vulnerable. When a young student finishes secondary school and enters the university at a very young age, they are exposed to the influence of older, more experienced students. This can lead to negative outcomes, including susceptibility to cultism.

 

“We see cases where students who looked like they belong to secondary school are actually in university, and they’re often below or just slightly above 18. That’s why we support this policy—so we can nurture these students to enter university as mature individuals who can think for themselves and resist negative influences. Social media and unscrupulous individuals in universities can easily corrupt younger students, whose primary goal should be learning.

 

“Allowing children under 18 to write SSCE is not the best approach and creates problems for us. We’ve seen high failure rates in WAEC, and last year, all the top scorers were from Ghana. Despite 1.8 million Nigerian students registering, none of them achieved top scores. Parents are also contributing to the issue by pushing their children to graduate too quickly.”

News

Bauchi Gov Bala Mohammed dumps PDP for APM

Published

on

By

Governor Bala Mohammed of Bauchi state has resigned his membership of the Peoples Democratic Congress (PDP).

The governor announced his decision to join the Allied Peoples Movement (APM) during a stakeholders’ meeting on Saturday.

See also  Protest video: Davido calls Yomi Fabiyi ‘mumu’
Continue Reading

News

I don’t reply when Obi’s supporters abuse me because I want peace —Amaechi

Published

on

By

Former governor of Rivers state and ex-minister of transportation, Rotimi Amaechi, has claimed that supporters of Peter Obi, the 2023 Labour Party (LP) presidential candidate, have “abused” him, but that he has refused to respond.

Amaechi spoke on Friday in Lagos at a town hall convened by his supporters under the aegis of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) progressive movement.

He said he has warned his supporters to argue with facts instead of engaging in online abuse of party chieftains or political opponents.

“My people don’t fight. Have you seen any Amaechi person fighting on social media? It is between Atiku people and the Obi people. And Obi people are abusing me; we never reply,” he said, according to a video posted on X by CRA27 Advocacy, his campaign network.

“It’s not because we don’t know English or we cannot reply. The reason we don’t reply is that we always want peace.”

See also  FG plans tax breaks for companies employing more staff

He said his camp avoids verbal attacks to keep the opposition united ahead of the elections.

“There are things you say when you want to win, because it becomes difficult to bring everybody together. Because we know we will win, we’re not abusing everybody, so we can bring everyone together. I’m careful what I say,” he said.

“My team is under permanent instruction: don’t abuse anybody in ADC. Even Mr President — don’t abuse the president, show the facts.”

Amaechi, who contested for the presidency in 2023 on the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC), but came second in the primary won by President Bola Tinubu, officially joined the ADC on March 6 and is seeking the party’s 2027 presidential ticket alongside Obi and former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar.

At the Lagos event, Amaechi reiterated his ambition, urging Nigerians to assess his record against that of Obi and the former vice-president.

“Compare me to Peter Obi — we were governors at the same time. If he’s a better governor, please choose him. Although the former vice-president was not a governor, he was once a vice-president. Compare my role as governor, as minister, with the role he played as vice-president. If he’s a better person, please choose him,” he said.

See also  Good morning! Here Are Some Major News Headlines In The Newspapers Today: Strike: You risk six months jail term, FG warns workers

He added that he played more roles in public service than the other ADC figures, citing his hands-on approach to infrastructure projects.

“When you are sleeping, I’m running on this track, coming back to Lagos by 2 a.m. As minister, from Ibadan, making sure this job was completed on time — I wasn’t sitting in my office writing or reading memos. I made sure that either once or twice a month, I’m on this track. When we were building Kaduna–Kano, the same thing,” he said.

Amaechi described himself as a “practical man” who understands realities on the ground.

“I’m young. I’m on the street. I know what the problems are. As a minister, as a former governor, I eat in the same restaurants people eat. I don’t go to all these big men’s restaurants because they don’t give me the kind of food I ate when I was small,” he said.

He urged supporters of Obi and Atiku to close ranks, warning that internal divisions could weaken the opposition.

See also  FG, states, LGAs shared N616.87bn in April – FAAC

“If you cause this kind of friction, it will be difficult to come together to defeat Tinubu. Focus on defeating Tinubu. On the day of the primary, go and vote for your own candidate, so that when your candidate wins, you’ll be able to bring everybody together,” he said.

Amaechi added that political leaders are influenced by their supporters, warning that persistent hostility could undermine future cooperation within the party.

Continue Reading

Politics

What supreme court judgement means for David Mark, ADC

Published

on

By

By Bolanle Olabimtan

The supreme court judgement on the leadership crisis in the African Democratic Congress (ADC) has generated mixed interpretations and confusion about who is in charge of the party.

However, rather than settle the dispute, the apex court’s decision focused on a procedural misstep and sent the case back to where it began.

To understand the case in its entirety and what the supreme court judgement means, it is important to start from the beginning.

FEDERAL HIGH COURT

On September 2, 2025, Nafiu Bala, former vice chairman of the ADC, approached a federal high court in Abuja (Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025), seeking to stop David Mark, former senate president, and his faction from parading themselves as leaders of the party.

Bala listed the ADC, Mark, Rauf Aregbesola (national secretary), the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), and Ralph Nwosu, the party’s founder and former national chairman, as defendants.

He also sought an order to restrain INEC from recognising them and to compel recognition of himself as acting national chairman.

He further filed motions seeking to stop the party from holding meetings, congresses, or conventions pending the determination of the suit.

The motion ex parte was heard on September 4, 2025, and Emeka Nwite, the trial judge, directed that the respondents, including INEC, be put on notice to show cause why the motion ex parte should not be granted.

This means the motion ex parte was neither granted nor refused.

COURT OF APPEAL

Dissatisfied with the interim ruling, Mark filed an appeal challenging the jurisdiction of the federal high court to continue to hear Bala’s suit.

However, on March 12, 2026, the court of appeal dismissed Mark’s case in its entirety, holding that it was incompetent and unmeritorious.

See also  BREAKING: Police dispel rumour of planted bombs across Abuja

A three-member panel of the appellate court, led by Uchechukwu Onyemenam, found that there was no substantive ruling by the federal high court on the ex parte application, as the trial judge merely ordered that parties be put on notice.

As such, there was no valid decision upon which an appeal could properly be anchored.

The court further faulted Mark for relying on an enrolled order rather than the actual proceedings and ruling of the trial court, noting that only the judge’s pronouncement constitutes the authentic record of the court.

The court also held that the appeal arose from an interlocutory ruling, for which Mark failed to obtain the required leave before approaching the appellate court.

On the issue of jurisdiction, the court of appeal noted that the question was still pending before the federal high court and could not be determined at the appellate level at that stage, describing the appeal as premature.

Having dismissed the appeal, the court issued preservatory orders to safeguard the subject matter of the dispute.

The court directed the parties to maintain the status quo ante bellum and to refrain from any action that could undermine the proceedings before the trial court.

On April 1, INEC announced that it would no longer recognise the factions of the ADC led by Mark or Bala, following its review of the court of appeal judgement.

SUPREME COURT

On further appeal to the apex court, Mark, among other things, argued that he had a lawful right to proceed with the appeal without seeking leave of the trial court.

See also  Strike: ASUU keeps students, FG waiting, to announce decision Monday

He also raised the issue of jurisdiction, arguing that the trial court lacks the jurisdiction to entertain Bala’s suit.

In a unanimous judgement delivered on Thursday, a five-member panel of the supreme court held that the appeal fails in part and succeeds in part.

In the first part, the apex court agreed with the court of appeal’s verdict that the appellant (Mark) ought to have sought leave of the trial court before filing an appeal, since the substantive issues before the trial court had not yet been heard and determined.

“I find the court below to be right that the appellant, in whose favour the order of the federal high court was made, ought to have sought the leave of the court before appeal…” the supreme court held.

Mohammed Garba, who read the lead judgment, held that since the appellant failed to meet the condition precedent for filing the appeal, it robbed the appellate court and, by extension, the supreme court of jurisdiction to entertain the suit.

The lead justice also held that the issue opposing jurisdiction of the trial court cannot be determined by the supreme court since it is already the subject of a pending preliminary objection, which has not yet been determined at the high court.

“I therefore endorse the decision by the court below upholding the first respondent’s preliminary objection to the competence of the appellant’s appeal and an order striking it out on that ground,” Garba said.

Consequently, the court ordered the parties to go back and continue with the suit pending at the federal high court.

On the second issue, which succeeded, the supreme court said the court of appeal overstepped its boundaries by asking parties to maintain the status quo.

See also  FG, states, LGAs shared N616.87bn in April – FAAC

“Status quo ante bellum”, in legal terms, refers to restoring the condition of the position of things as they were before the dispute arose.

The court reasoned that once the appeal was dismissed, the court of appeal had become functus officio — meaning it had exhausted its authority in the case and could not make further substantive orders.

The supreme court consequently set aside the status quo order, describing it as “unnecessary, unwarranted and improper”.

“The court was wrong to have made a purported preservatory order suo moto in respect of a proceeding pending before the lower court, as that power belongs to that trial court, which shall be in control of proceedings in the matter when it is returned to it by the appellate court either for continuation, hearing or retrial as the case may be,” the court ruled.

DOES THIS MEAN DAVID MARK’S FACTION HAS WON?

The verdict of the supreme court does not mean victory for the Mark-led faction or even any faction.

While the removal of the status quo order may give the Mark-led faction some breathing room, the supreme court did not affirm any leadership.

The most important question of who legitimately controls the ADC remains unresolved.

The outcome will now depend on the decision of the trial court after full proceedings.

After the matter is resolved at the trial court, the losing faction would likely appeal the verdict back up to the supreme court.

Meanwhile, INEC has updated its website, listing Mark as the national chairman of the ADC and Aregbesola as national secretary

Culled from TheCable

Continue Reading

Trending News