The battle between erstwhile political allies, Kenneth Okonkwo, of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and Peter Obi is not showing any signs of ending anytime soon following the refusal of the ADC chieftain to heed Obi’s demand for a retraction and apology over claims relating to the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) primary elections.
Okonkwo, while responding to Obi’s pre-action notice, said he would not withdraw the comments he made during a recent interview on Channels Television, insisting that they were based on complaints brought to him by some aspirants and other sources.
The dispute stems from allegations made by Okonkwo on Sunrise Daily, where he claimed that some aspirants in the NDC were asked to pay money to secure party tickets.
Obi, the NDC’s presidential candidate, subsequently issued a pre-action letter through Alex Ejesieme, a senior advocate of Nigeria (SAN), demanding a retraction, public apology, and N5 billion in damages.
The former Anambra governor described Okonkwo’s claims as false, malicious, and defamatory.
However, in a reply dated June 16, Okonkwo, through his solicitors at Supreme God Chambers, denied defaming Obi.
“The kernel of your letter is that our Client defamed your Client through the interview on Channels Television on 8 June 2026,” Okonkwo’s lawyers wrote.
“Our Client denies that he defamed your Client in any manner whatsoever and expressly assert that his positon on the issues he expressed reflects the true positon of the matters so reflected.”
Okonkwo said his comments were based on information allegedly provided by Obunike Ohaegbu, an NDC house of representatives aspirant from Anambra state, and other party members.
According to the letter, Ohaegbu approached Okonkwo to help recover N10 million he allegedly paid to the party during the nomination process.
The lawyers claimed Ohaegbu believed he had secured the ticket after making the payment, but was later directed to participate in direct primaries.
The response further alleged that Ohaegbu held Obi responsible for the development and encouraged Okonkwo to publicise the matter.
Okonkwo’s legal team also referenced complaints allegedly made by other aspirants, including OAU Onyema, a former senatorial hopeful in Enugu state.
The letter alleged that some aspirants paid various sums during the screening and nomination process and later felt misled by party officials.
The lawyers argued that Okonkwo acted within his rights as a lawyer, public affairs analyst, and politician by drawing attention to the complaints.
“Our Client stands by the truth of all he declared on Channels TV,” the lawyers said.
“The whole idea of his speaking on Channels TV, which information he received from the aspirants, NDC, and other Nigerians, is to expose transactional politics, ticket racketeering, extortion of aspirants, misleading representations, false pretense, undue influence and coercive pressure.”
They also accused Obi’s camp of publishing Okonkwo’s personal telephone number online after the pre-action letter was issued.
The lawyers described the publication as a breach of privacy and alleged that it exposed their client to attacks and harassment.