Connect with us

Politics

2023 general election one of the best planned polls in history – INEC

Published

on

 

The 2023 general election was one of the best organised in history, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has claimed.

 

In a report released on Friday on the 2023 general election, INEC said leveraging on well-set practices in place since the 1999 general election, it started planning for the 2023 polls in earnest in 2019.

 

“The 2023 General Election was one of the, if not the best, planned election in the history of the Commission,” the report reads.

 

“Drawing on the EMSC’s three monitoring zones – Green, Amber and Red – planning for 2023 began immediately after 2019 through the implementation of some of the monitoring mechanisms such as process reviews and stakeholder engagements, electoral materials audit, identification and sorting of reusable election materials, assessment of storage facilities, assessment of electoral materials requirements for the 2023 General Election, the review and formulation of planning documents, and the review of regulations/guidelines/manuals and related operational documents for elections.”

READ  Unmarried policewomen can’t get pregnant - Court

 

The commission said the legal framework for the 2023 general election played a significant role in ensuring the integrity, transparency, and credibility of the process.

 

“Passed into law on the 25th of February 2022, the Electoral Act 2022, not only provided an enhanced electoral legal framework for conduct of election in Nigeria, but also sought to address several lingering challenges to the management of the entire electoral process identified by the Commission and other stakeholders,” the report added.

 

“The New Act introduced about 80 new provisions addressing wide ranging issues such as the independence of the Commission, the time-frame for the publication of notice of elections, the conduct and management of political party primaries and campaigns, the development and management of electronic databases for the register of voters as well as for election results, the power of reviewing election results and declarations by the Commission, clarification of the meaning of over-voting, the involvement of political appointees in partisan politics, the death of candidates in the middle of an election, the deployment of election technology, as well as the management of results, to mention but a few.

READ  Challenge results in court, INEC replies LP, PDP

 

“To appreciate the far-reaching contributions of the 2022 Act, it is important to briefly recount the 2010 legal framework and some of its constraints.

 

“The Electoral Act of 2010 was the governing law for elections in Nigeria from 2010 to 2022. It was a significant piece of legislation that introduced several reforms into the electoral process, including provisions on funding, independence of the Commission, conduct of political party nomination processes and election campaigns amongst others.

 

“The 2010 Electoral Act was amended about five times by the 6th National Assembly to enable the Commission to conduct a fresh voter registration exercise as well as the General Election in February and March of 2011.

 

“However, since the 2011 General Election, the Commission and other stakeholders in the political and electoral processes have identified several gaps and challenges in the 2010 Act that needed to be addressed to enhance the credibility, transparency, and inclusivity of elections.

READ  Minimum wage, pensions: Govs, NLC on collision course

 

“The Commission then made comprehensive submissions to both the 7th and 8th National Assemblies for the reform of the legal framework.

 

“These reforms were not effected during the 2011-2015 and 2015-2019 Electoral Cycles. It was only during the 2019-2023 Electoral Cycle that some of these suggestions for reform were incorporated into the existing legal framework as the new 2022 Electoral Act.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Obtaining injunction at 2am can’t sack lawmakers | Backing you was a mistake, Wike tells Fubara

Published

on

By

 

Nyesom Wike, minister of the federal capital territory (FCT), says no one has the power to sack elected members of the Rivers house of assembly.

 

Wike and Siminalayi Fubara, governor of Rivers, have been locked in a battle for the political structure of Rivers since 2023.

The rift between both men has led to a polarisation of the Rivers house of assembly — with each camp electing a speaker loyal to either man.

 

In December, 25 Rivers lawmakers loyal to Wike defected from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC).

 

Their seats were subsequently declared vacant by Edison Ehie, who was then speaker of the camp loyal to Fubara.

 

THE INJUNCTION

On May 6, Fubara told state legislators loyal to Wike that they owe their existence to him.

 

“Those group of men who claim they are our assembly members are not assembly members — they are not existing,” Fubara said.

READ  DSS releases IPOB supporter, Mama Biafra

 

On May 10, a Rivers high court granted an interim injunction restraining Martin Amaewhule, a lawmaker loyal to Wike, from parading himself as speaker of the state assembly.

 

Charles Wali, the presiding judge, also restrained 25 other assembly members from parading themselves as legislators.

The motion ex parte was filed by Victor Jumbo, the factional speaker and two assembly members — Sokari Goodboy and Orubienimigha Timothy. All three legislators are loyal to Fubara.

 

‘MY JOB IS TO MAKE THEM ANGRY’

Speaking on Saturday in Ogu-Bolo LGA of Rivers at an event to honour George Sekibo, a former senator who has spent 36 years in public service, Wike aimed more thinly veiled barbs Fubara’s way.

The former governor’s remarks also came after Fubara gazetted an executive order moving the sitting of the state house of assembly to the government house.

 

Addressing Anorld Davids, lawmaker representing Ogu-Bolo constituency in the assembly, Wike said: “Let me say this clearly, Arnold, don’t be frightened that anybody would remove you as an assembly member.”

READ  2023: Politicians buying PVCs from registered voters - INEC

 

“Nobody will remove you as an assembly member.

 

“Most of you don’t understand. This is our work. What l am doing is to make them fear, to make them angry.

 

“I have no other job than to make them angry everyday, to make them make mistakes everyday. And they will be in trouble everyday. So, don’t worry about yourselves.

 

“If they like, they can go to anybody by 2am, 4am to get an injunction. The law will take its course. We are not afraid. We followed due process. We must follow due process.

“We are not going to harm anybody. We are not going to give money to anybody to buy arms and kill anybody. We won’t do that.”

‘HANDPICKING YOU WAS A MISTAKE’

 

Again, Wike apologised for backing Fubara to succeed him as governor.

“I have made a mistake. I own up. And I ask God to forgive me. I have said all of you forgive me. But, we will correct it at the appropriate time,” he said.

READ  1000 dead in Afghanistan earthquake

“I am a human being. I am bound to make a mistake. My judgment can be wrong. So, forgive me for making a wrong judgment. That is life.”

Continue Reading

Politics

We are now in full control of Rivers, PDP boasts

Published

on

By

 

The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has declared full control over Rivers State, asserting that Governor Siminalayi Fubara and the party now dominate the state’s political landscape.

The PDP, in a statement by its National Publicity Secretary, Debo Ologunagba, on Saturday, claimed that all legislators who defected to the All Progressives Congress have forfeited their seats, citing constitutional provisions.

On Tuesday, the Rivers State Government dismissed a call on the state House of Assembly by the Caretaker Committee of the APC in the state to commence impeachment proceedings against Fubara.

Ologunagba emphasized that legal considerations now overwhelmingly favour the PDP, dismissing the APC’s claims as futile attempts to subvert Nigeria’s constitution.

 

He stated, “It is indeed pathetic for the APC to think that the facts and true import of Section 109 (1) (g) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) to the effect that the former lawmakers have since lost their seats can be muddled and lost in litigation and lengthy press statements.

READ  Court says only INEC can determine mode of collating, transmitting election results

 

“Interestingly, in the failed bid to subvert the Constitution to give the former members of the Rivers State House of Assembly a lifeline, the APC ended up admitting the clarity of the provision of Section 109(1)(g) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) in voiding their seats upon their defection.

 

“For the avoidance of doubt, Section 109 (1)(g) of the Constitution is clear in providing that “a member of a House of Assembly shall vacate his seat in the House if – being a person whose election to the House of Assembly was sponsored by a political party, he becomes a member of another political party before expiration of the period for which that House was elected:

 

“Provided that his membership of the latter political party is not as a result of a division in the political party of which he was previously a member or of a merger of two or more political parties or factions by one of which he was previously sponsored.”

 

Ologunagba said that all House of Assembly members who joined the APC are now former members.

READ  DSS releases IPOB supporter, Mama Biafra

He urged both the APC and the legislators to abandon any hopes of their party assuming control of Rivers State.

 

“The former members of the Rivers State House of Assembly, for reasons best known to them, wittingly vacated and summarily lost their seats as nothing in the proviso protects or allows them to retain their membership of the Rivers State House of Assembly after decamping from the political party upon which they were elected.

 

“These former members of the Rivers State House of Assembly have only themselves to blame for Constitutionally vacating their seats; a course which cannot be reversed or remedied. They should admit their miscalculation and bear the inescapable consequences.

 

“This is especially so as the Supreme Court, in the case of Abegunde vs Ondo State House of Assembly and Others, has since clarified and affirmed the import of the proviso in Section 109(1)(g) in validating the automatic vacation of a seat by a member of a Legislative House who defected from the Party upon which he was elected into that House.

READ  Unmarried policewomen can’t get pregnant - Court

 

“For the umpteenth time, the PDP cautions the APC to steer clear of Rivers State; it should perish the thoughts of forcefully taking over the State and stop exasperating the public space by seeking to reverse the irreversible.

 

“The APC should come to terms that with the vacation of seats by the former lawmakers, the quorum of the Rivers State House of Assembly will be determined by the number of the remaining lawmakers as provided by law; until a bye-election is conducted to fill the vacancies now existing in the Rivers State House of Assembly as a result of the defection by the former members,” Ologunagba further stated.

 

Amidst the many troubles rocking the Rivers State political structure, the APC on Friday stated that the “egregious actions” of Fubara are indicators of his impeachment process talks.

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Reckless statement’ — APC knocks Fubara for saying Rivers assembly members don’t exist

Published

on

By

 

The All Progressives Congress (APC) says a statement by Siminalayi Fubara, governor of Rivers, that the members of the state’s house of assembly do not exist, was reckless.

 

On Monday, Fubara said the existence of members of the Rivers state house of assembly is based on his recognition.

 

In the past few months, Fubara and members of the Rivers state assembly have been at loggerheads.

 

The rift between the governor and Nyesom Wike, minister of the federal capital territory (FCT), has led members of the Rivers assembly to take sides.

 

In a statement on Friday, Felix Morka, spokesperson of the APC, said the state house of assembly is a creation of the constitution.

 

“Governor Fubara’s declaration that the Rivers State House of Assembly does not exist is not only reckless, it is a direct affront to the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,” the statement reads.

READ  1000 dead in Afghanistan earthquake

 

“The House of Assembly is a creation of the Constitution, and vested with the legislative authority of the state.

 

“The members of the Assembly were elected by the good people of Rivers state in the same manner that Fubara was elected Governor.

 

“The Assembly does not exist at the Governor’s pleasure or fanciful whims. The legislature is at the core of the idea of democracy. It is co-equal with the executive and judicial arms of government.

 

“The constitutionally entrenched principle of separation of powers among the three arms of government guarantees essential checks and balances required to ensure observance of the rule of law. The rule of law is indispensable to democracy and constitutional order.

 

“If his declaration that the House of Assembly is nonexistent is based on the fact that the 27 members who decamped from PDP to APC have lost their seats, then Governor Fubara is sorely misled.”

READ  2023: Politicians buying PVCs from registered voters - INEC

 

Morka said the alleged attack by Fubara on the house of assembly and its leadership is disrespectful to the order of a court.

 

“Governor Fubara’s quest to repudiate the Constitution and govern in denial of the existence of the state legislature is, in and of itself, among other grounds, an impeachable offence,” he said.

 

“We strongly counsel Governor Fubara to submit himself to the dictates of the constitution and the rule of law.”

 

Continue Reading

Trending News